On 20.09.2012 08:31, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:13:45 +0000, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > .... >> Java has its uses. Replacing a full-blown, fully implemented C++ >> codebase where the maintainers, who also set the API's, are all >> working in C++ means entirely different models of file handling, >> memory management, and maintaining compatibility with a dynamic and >> evolving codebase, in another language..... > Sorry, but this is just preemptive bad-mouting. The problem isn't that > there is no good good implementation of an svn server. The problem is that > the people working on that implementation aren't going to offer any path > that would enable other to integrate a git view on the repository. Heck, > they don't even offer a specified network protocol and insist that > *clients* use the C library. > > So the only way to have a server that is viewable via git and via svn is > to rewrite the server. (Which is also good because the svn repo structure > is, well, suboptimal even for its own pourposes.) And there is obviously > enough public interest/suffering that subgit isn't even the first project > to do so - see svnhub.com.
I'm sure there are any number of forums out there that specialize in Subversion-vs.-Git bashing. This is not one of them. Take this "discussion" somewhere else, thanks. -- Brane -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
