On 20.09.2012 15:58, Andy Singleton wrote: > On 9/20/2012 8:27 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> There are different projects that fulfill different needs, and we >> should strive to keep them alive for as long as they serve a useful >> purpose to their users. Users should freely be able choose between >> tools and benefit from improvements made to each tool. >> >> In the grand scheme of things, the development of git is entirely >> orthogonal to the development of Subversion. They're different tools >> made for different requirements. > > I would like to get a specific list of cases where this is true. It > is true that if you have a large, old, mixed revision repository that > is on Subversion now, you will want to keep your Subversion.
For the sake of precision, I'll just point out that there's no such thing as a "mixed-revision repository" in Subversion. There are mixed-revision working copies, but as far as I can see, neither subgit nor git itself make any attempt to deal with that model. -- Brane -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
