On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:49 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: > Honestly, the original phrasing of the docstring remains a better starting > point, in my opinion. Your changes lose the context that all this > discussion about depth and unversioned items in a versioned tree are still > tried primarily to the use of the force flag. So if it were up to me, I > would restore that paragraph to the state it was in and make only minor > changes: > > * If @a force is not set and @a path is already under version > * control, return the error #SVN_ERR_ENTRY_EXISTS. If @a force is > * set, do not error on already-versioned items. When used on a > * directory in conjunction with a @a depth value greater than > * #svn_depth_empty, this has the effect of scheduling for addition > * any unversioned files and directories scattered within even a > * versioned tree (up to @a depth).
Committed this unchanged.
