Of course, it would make more sense to *rename* the parameter to something more appropriate. "skip_versioned_nodes" might work. On Oct 5, 2012 5:19 PM, "Ben Reser" <bre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:49 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> > wrote: > > Honestly, the original phrasing of the docstring remains a better > starting > > point, in my opinion. Your changes lose the context that all this > > discussion about depth and unversioned items in a versioned tree are > still > > tried primarily to the use of the force flag. So if it were up to me, I > > would restore that paragraph to the state it was in and make only minor > changes: > > > > * If @a force is not set and @a path is already under version > > * control, return the error #SVN_ERR_ENTRY_EXISTS. If @a force is > > * set, do not error on already-versioned items. When used on a > > * directory in conjunction with a @a depth value greater than > > * #svn_depth_empty, this has the effect of scheduling for addition > > * any unversioned files and directories scattered within even a > > * versioned tree (up to @a depth). > > Committed this unchanged. >
