C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 11/28/2012 01:44 PM, Julian Foad wrote: >> If the logic is that the list of added paths is not necessarily contain >> all leaf nodes, then doesn't it follow that dry_run_deleted_p() also >> needs to be updated to check whether any parent of the path being checked >> is in the list? > > That's not the logic, but your question about whether dry_run_deleted_p() > needs a similar fix is still valid. I don't believe a change is necessary, > though, because it not possible with Ev1 to even convey a nested deletion.
Oops, I meant to ask about dry_run_added_p(). - Julian
