On 11/28/2012 02:36 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote: > >> On 11/28/2012 01:44 PM, Julian Foad wrote: >>> If the logic is that the list of added paths is not necessarily contain >>> all leaf nodes, then doesn't it follow that dry_run_deleted_p() also >>> needs to be updated to check whether any parent of the path being checked >>> is in the list? >> >> That's not the logic, but your question about whether dry_run_deleted_p() >> needs a similar fix is still valid. I don't believe a change is necessary, >> though, because it not possible with Ev1 to even convey a nested deletion. > > Oops, I meant to ask about dry_run_added_p().
Ah. No, that function should remain the same. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
