On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09.01.2013 20:00, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Branko Čibej <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On 09.01.2013 19:35, Ben Reser wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Branko Čibej > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> On 09.01.2013 18:54, [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> - if (header->is_delta) > > >>> + if (header->is_delta == FALSE) > > >> Can we please use logical operators to test boolean values, not > > >> arithmetic ones? > > > > > > Hm. I somehow got the impression from other people's > > code that they liked the more explicit version. > > Yah, I noticed some people prefer to code COBOL in C. :) > > > Personally, I prefer the shorter one. > > Agreed. Of course I expect this to escalate into a flamewar, but I'll > note that while "== FALSE" is marginally acceptable, "== TRUE" is not, > because of C's rules about truth values. > r1431017 has the flame bait. -- Stefan^2. -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: * http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download *
