Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 15:08:51 +0200: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 02:50:26PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 12.07.2013 13:54, 刘新星 wrote: > > > Thank you for your suggestions! > > > > > > mod_ldap for performance improvement is a further consideration. > > > > > > Actually I want to add ldap support for mod_authz_svn most. > > > As far as I can see, when we need ldap authentication, we would take > > > these combination 'apache + subversioin'. > > > Is it a good idea to move ldap.c from libsvn_subr to mod_authz_svn ? > > I think we should ensure that both svnserve and mod_authz_svn interpret > the authz rule configuration file in the same way. If one supports > ldap and the other does not, the authz rules files are not compatible > between server implementations. Users should be able to switch between > apache and svnserve without such problems.
There's already an incompatibility with section names, svnserve uses the (--root=ARG)-relative path and mod_dav_svn uses the basename of the repos dir. That dofesn't excuse diverging them further, of course.
