dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: JavaHL test failure and warning in 1.14.1 Alexandr Miloslavskiy
  • Re: JavaHL test failure and warning in 1.14.1 Alexandr Miloslavskiy
  • Re: JavaHL test failure and warning in 1.14.1 James McCoy
  • Re: JavaHL test failure and warning in 1.14.1 Alexandr Miloslavskiy
  • Re: JavaHL test failure and warning in 1.14.1 James McCoy
• Feature request: expand the svn:auto-props glob patterns to include GNU extensions Eugeny Sosnovsky
  • Re: Feature request: expand the svn:auto-props glob patterns to include GNU extensions Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Feature request: expand the svn:auto-props glob patterns to include GNU extensions Eugeny Sosnovsky
  • Re: Feature request: expand the svn:auto-props glob patterns to include GNU extensions C. Michael Pilato
  • Re: Feature request: expand the svn:auto-props glob patterns to include GNU extensions Branko Čibej
  • Re: Feature request: expand the svn:auto-props glob patterns to include GNU extensions Martin Edgar Furter Rathod
  • Re: Feature request: expand the svn:auto-props glob patterns to include GNU extensions Nathan Hartman
• Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
  • Re: Buildbot Migration Bert Huijben
  • Re: Re: Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
  • Re: Re: Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
  • Re: Re: Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
  • Re: Re: Buildbot Migration Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Re: Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
  • Re: Re: Buildbot Migration Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Buildbot Migration Branko Čibej
  • Re: Buildbot Migration Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Buildbot Migration Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Buildbot Migration Nathan Hartman
  • RE: Buildbot Migration Bert Huijben
  • RE: Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
  • RE: Buildbot Migration Bert Huijben
  • RE: Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
  • RE: Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
  • RE: Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
  • RE: Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
  • RE: Buildbot Migration Gavin McDonald
• next planned release Stefan Küng
  • Re: next planned release Daniel Sahlberg
• Re: svn commit: r1894491 - /subversion/trunk/INSTALL James McCoy
  • Re: svn commit: r1894491 - /subversion/trunk/INSTALL Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: svn commit: r1894491 - /subversion/trunk/INSTALL Nathan Hartman
• [PATCH] On Windows: fix build in paths with spaces Alexandr Miloslavskiy
  • Re: [PATCH] On Windows: fix build in paths with spaces Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: [PATCH] On Windows: fix build in paths with spaces Alexandr Miloslavskiy
  • Re: [PATCH] On Windows: fix build in paths with spaces Alexandr Miloslavskiy
• [PATCH] On Windows: support install layout of sasl Alexandr Miloslavskiy
• SVN 1.14.1 slightly broken on Windows for working copies in drive root? Thomas Singer
  • Re: SVN 1.14.1 slightly broken on Windows for working copies in drive root? Johan Corveleyn
• [Regression in httpd 2.4.49] mod_dav: REPORT requests no longer return errors Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: [Regression in httpd 2.4.49] mod_dav: REPORT requests no longer return errors Ruediger Pluem
  • Re: [Regression in httpd 2.4.49] mod_dav: REPORT requests no longer return errors Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: [Regression in httpd 2.4.49] mod_dav: REPORT requests no longer return errors Ruediger Pluem
  • Re: [Regression in httpd 2.4.49] mod_dav: REPORT requests no longer return errors Ruediger Pluem
• Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Stefan Sperling
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Stefan Sperling
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Branko Čibej
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Branko Čibej
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Lorenz
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Branko Čibej
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • The pristineless-hack branch (was: Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Ivan Zhakov
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Nathan Hartman
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Mark Phippard
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Vincent Lefevre
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Karl Fogel
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects. Julian Foad
  • Initial patch for storing the pristines-on-demand setting in the working copy (Issue 4889) Evgeny Kotkov
  • Re: Initial patch for storing the pristines-on-demand setting in the working copy (Issue 4889) Julian Foad
  • Re: Initial patch for storing the pristines-on-demand setting in the working copy (Issue 4889) Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Julian Foad
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Nathan Hartman
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Johan Corveleyn
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Daniel Sahlberg
  • Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525). Karl Fogel
  • Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format (was: Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525).) Evgeny Kotkov via dev
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format (was: Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525).) Branko Čibej
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format (was: Re: Getting to first release of pristines-on-demand feature (#525).) Daniel Shahaf
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Karl Fogel
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Branko Čibej
  • Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format Daniel Sahlberg

• Earlier messages
• Later messages