Philip Martin <[email protected]> writes: > What is the canonical form of this? > > scheme://./ > > Should we drop '.' to give: > > scheme:/// > > or do we have to retain it as > > scheme://./ > > and change svn_uri_is_canonical to allow a hostname '.'?
Another problem is
scheme://[.]
which we currently canonicalize as
scheme://[.%5D
and that doesn't look right either.
--
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
