On 27.11.2013 17:09, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com
> <mailto:nka...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf
>     <d...@daniel.shahaf.name <mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name>> wrote:
>     > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 21:17:11 -0500:
>     >> I've gone ahead and updated, and casually tested, my published
>     RHEL 6
>     >> compatible RPM building tools with a new 1.8.5 tag at:
>     >>
>     >>      
>      https://github.com/nkadel/subversion-1.8.x-srpm/tree/1.8.5-0.1
>     >
>     > Perhaps these should be linked to from
>     http://subversion.apache.org/packages?
>
>     I'd welcome that. They don't contain binary RPM's, partly because I'm
>     not in a good position to run a secure binary repository with GPG keys
>     and fully controlled build environments. But they're very useful RPM
>     building toolkits for developers, and I've sent notes to RHEL and
>     Fedora about issues I've found.. I've also submitted them to Repoforge
>     in the past: looks like time to update those rquests.
>
>
> I think it would be very confusing to include this with our binary
> packages.  This is not a binary package so why would it belong on that
> list?
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to add a section to INSTALL that points to
> this along with appropriate instructions for using it?  Even if that
> just says to read the current README?

Meh. Just remove "binary" from the page title and you're done.

-- Brane


-- 
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. br...@wandisco.com

Reply via email to