On 7/9/13, 6:52 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Philip Martin wrote on Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:12:35 +0100: >> Does that work in 2.5? >> > > It works in 2.4: > > >>> r1_time = datetime.datetime(2007, 1, 10, 1, 25, 1, 123456) > >>> peg_time = r1_time + datetime.timedelta(microseconds=1) > >>> repr(peg_time) > 'datetime.datetime(2007, 1, 10, 1, 25, 1, 123457)' > > The documentation in 2.5.4 promises timedelta objects have microsecond > resolution.
It works in 2.5.6. I tested it with a 2.5.6 I built from source on Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit. Note you need to set LDFLAGS=-L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu or you'll get errors. I'm going to leave a trunk and 1.8.x with r1496127,r1567492,r1567494 running the test repeatedly over night to see if I can duplicate the occasional test failure (I see this sometimes on the machine I'm doing this on) like so: exit=0; while [ $exit -eq 0 ]; do $PYTHON $SRCDIR/subversion/tests/cmdline/checkout_tests.py 12; exit=$?; done But given that I'm not seeing errors with a reasonable amount of time running I'm adding r1567492 and r1567494 to the r1496127 nomination on 1.8.x and voting for it.
