On 20 June 2014 12:33, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've performed several FSFS performace tests using latest Subversion >> from trunk@r1602928. >> >> Please find results bellow. I'm also attaching results as a table in >> pdf for easier reading. >> >> Environment: >> Windows Server 2012 R2 (x64) >> 2 GB RAM, with 2 virtual processors hosted on Macbook with SSD disk >> Subversion 1.9.0-dev from trunk@r1602928 >> Test data: Ruby project repository (46054 revisions, 400mb-500mb size on >> disk) >> >> All tests are performed using default options. >> >> Tests performed: >> 1. svnadmin load -- loading first 5000 revisions into repository >> 2. svnadmin dump -- dumping all repository revions to NUL >> 3. svn log http:// -- svn log over http:// protocol to NUL >> 4. svn log file:// -- svn log over file:// protocol to NUL >> 5. svn export http:// -- svn export over http:// protocol to local disk >> 6. svn export file:// -- svn export over file:// protocol to local disk >> >> Subversion 1.9.0-dev, fsfs6 unpacked repository >> =============================================== > > .. >> >> svn export http:// 7.336 7.757 7.437 >> svn export file:// 4.151 4.854 4.310 > > > Did you actually run the export on the repository root? I did run svn export only for trunk of course, but I tested svn log on repository root.
-- Ivan Zhakov
