On 07.07.2014 17:07, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 07/07/2014 10:58 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> My technical opinion that FSFS7/log addressing is slower by design, >> because it's doing more (read index, then read data instead of just >> read data) and only caching makes them comparable on performance to >> FSFS6 repositories. > I'm coming into this kinda late and after two weeks of vacation, so > please forgive me if I misunderstand the above, but is it true that > FSFS7 requires some kind of non-trivial caching just to match FSFS6's > performance?
Yup. -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
