On 30 September 2014 20:01, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > On 26 September 2014 20:34, Stefan Fuhrmann > <stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: [...] >> Not being Mike, here is my opinion anyway: I'm +1 on your proposal. >> In fact, I had planned to call for exactly that vote at some point mid-Oct >> (so I could complete work on the other bits e.g. svnfsfs before that). >> >> Due to the size of the features (plural), I think we should extend the >> voting period to at least 2 weeks. This will give people who are new >> to the code a chance to actually review it. I don't think there is any >> point in rushing a decision at this stage of 1.9 "slippage". >> > Stefan, > > It seems that you started to change fsfs code actively, so I postpone > creation of the formal vote until the code and data format (!) will > be "stabilized" again. > > Please let me know when you finish. Hi Stefan,
Could you please confirm that the log-addressing code and data format are stable now and ready for review and vote. -- Ivan Zhakov
