On 09/26/2014 12:34 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com > <mailto:i...@visualsvn.com>> wrote: > > I think it would be fair to call a 'Consensus Approval' vote [1,2] > for leaving > the log-addressing feature in the trunk. In other words, it will > be required > at least three binding '+1' votes (and no vetos) to leave the code > in trunk. > > It will be also assumed that: > a) +1 votes could be presented only by folks who both understand > the log-addressing feature and have reviewed the code. > b) a concrete technical justification showing why the change is bad > (allows data to be corrupted, negatively affects performance, > etc. ) > should be provided for a '-1' vote. > > Effectively, this vote will be similar to our 3-vote policy for > branches > but made a little later. > > What do you think about this plan for vote? > > > Hi Ivan, > > Not being Mike, here is my opinion anyway: I'm +1 on your proposal. > In fact, I had planned to call for exactly that vote at some point mid-Oct > (so I could complete work on the other bits e.g. svnfsfs before that). > > Due to the size of the features (plural), I think we should extend the > voting period to at least 2 weeks. This will give people who are new > to the code a chance to actually review it. I don't think there is any > point in rushing a decision at this stage of 1.9 "slippage". > > -- Stefan^2.
I'm late to the party, but this all sounds great. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
