On 26 Jun 2015 5:25 pm, "Evgeny Kotkov" <evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > > Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: > > > I like this a lot. Much better than my hacks upon hacks. :) > > > > Please go ahead and commit this. As you said, JavaHL would break after > > this change. If you like, I can fix it afterwards, but I'm on a rather > > tight schedule tomorrow and on the week-end so I very likely couldn't do > > that before Monday. > > Thanks! I committed the patch in r1687769 and r1687776 [1,2] (second patch > improves the documentation). > > As for the JavaHL bindings, r1687769 contains a minimal necessary change for > them, but doesn't yet allow passing a custom verify callback when calling > SVNRepos.verify(). It would be a nice thing to have, but I am thinking that > we should first nominate this change for a backport to 1.9.x, as we are > dealing with an API change. > > Can we do that without having a complete JavaHL wrapper for this?
Of course. We've never treated incomplete bindings as showstoppers. I'm half done with the JavaHL change, too; will probably finish tonight. > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/r1687769 > [1] https://svn.apache.org/r1687776 > > > Regards, > Evgeny Kotkov
