Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: >> It would be a nice thing to have, but I am thinking that we should first >> nominate this change for a backport to 1.9.x, as we are dealing with an >> API change. >> >> Can we do that without having a complete JavaHL wrapper for this? > > Of course. We've never treated incomplete bindings as showstoppers. I'm half > done with the JavaHL change, too; will probably finish tonight.
Thanks for confirming my thoughts. I nominated the whole group of changes (r1684940, r1685034, r1687769, r1687776) for a backport to /branches/1.9.x. Regards, Evgeny Kotkov
