> -----Original Message----- > From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com] > Sent: maandag 13 juli 2015 11:08 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1690591 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/include/proxy.swg >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/inclu > de/proxy.swg?rev=1690591&r1=1690590&r2=1690591&view=diff > > > ================================================================ > ============== > > --- subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/include/proxy.swg (original) > > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/include/proxy.swg Mon Jul 13 > 09:04:13 2015 > > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ > > > > /* Default code for all wrapped proxy classes in Python */ > > %define %proxy_pythoncode(TYPE) > > -%pythoncode { > > +%pythoncode %{ > > def set_parent_pool(self, parent_pool=None): > > """Create a new proxy object for TYPE""" > > import libsvn.core, weakref > > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ > > self.__dict__.setdefault("_members",{})[name] = value > > > > return _swig_setattr(self, self.__class__, name, value) > > -} > > +%} > > %enddef > > > > /* Define a proxy for wrapping an existing struct */ > > > I've tried this before and it didn't fix the bindings at all. Swig was patched to support this starting with 3.0.6. The problem is now: Which swig versions do we want to support... Bert
