On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:00:17AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:41:23AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: > > https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/317 > > > > Apparently this breaks older versions of Swig ... > > Ah, ugh... yes I should have realised this. Sorry. > > I think the choices are: > > a) keep comments in that code & use {}, only support SWIG < 3.0 > b) keep comments & use %{/%}, only support SWIG > 3.0.5 > c) drop the comments from that code, support SWIG < 3.0 && > 3.0.5 > > I'm guessing (c) is preferred?
Was there a resolution to this? Debian recently switch to the 3.0 series of swig by default, which broke the subversion build due to the requirement of < 3.0 swig. I can work around this for now by explicitly using the 2.0 series of swig, but that's being considered for removal from Debian before the next stable release. Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <james...@debian.org>
