On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Stefan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > Op 11-aug.-2015 16:37 schreef "Stefan Fuhrmann" > <[email protected]>: >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Stefan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm wondering whether it would be reasonable to release another >>> 1.7-build. >>> >>> 1.7.21 added support to build 1.7 using Visual Studio 2015. However there >>> seemed to have been an oversight with neon, which misses the >>> platformtoolset-setting in the project file (see: [PATCH] Fix SVN 1.7 build >>> issues with VS >2010). >>> >>> This leads to a linker issue, when u try to build SVN 1.7 out of the box >>> using VS >= 2013. >>> >>> In the light of 1.7 no longer being supported it still might be a good >>> idea to release a final 1.7 build so at least the stated VS 2015 is not >>> broken forever for 1.7. >>> >>> If it's going to be released, then I'd also propose to apply the >>> correctness-patch (see: [PATCH] correct ToolsVersion in VS project files) >>> which also corrects the ToolsVersion-parameter for VS >= 2013. >> >> >> I fine with canning 1.7.22 in favor of a "truly golden" 1.7.23. >> After all, we rolled 1.7.22 for a similar reason not because >> of actual user code breakage. >> >> That said, it may require extra testing effort on Windows >> (at least testing that vs2015 and vs2013 work) and I'd >> rather have our Windows devs comment on that. >> >> -- Stefan^2. > > I can test on vs2013. If necessary I can also upgrade my environment to vs > 2015, but I'd prefer to keep 2013 for now (and I don't think I can use them > both alongside each other). > > Just so you know: Using VS 2015 and VS 2013 alongside one another is > supported and works quite well (have it running here too -- actually I've > set up VS 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2015 all on the same machine). > > Regards, > Stefan >
Oh, ok, great. Thanks for letting me know. Then I might be able to test them both, if that's desired. That is, if there is consensus on making a 1.7.23, and someone does the RM bits for that ... -- Johan
