On 12.08.2015 09:43, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Stefan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> Op 11-aug.-2015 16:37 schreef "Stefan Fuhrmann" >> <[email protected]>: >>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Stefan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm wondering whether it would be reasonable to release another >>>> 1.7-build. >>>> >>>> 1.7.21 added support to build 1.7 using Visual Studio 2015. However there >>>> seemed to have been an oversight with neon, which misses the >>>> platformtoolset-setting in the project file (see: [PATCH] Fix SVN 1.7 >>>> build >>>> issues with VS >2010). >>>> >>>> This leads to a linker issue, when u try to build SVN 1.7 out of the box >>>> using VS >= 2013. >>>> >>>> In the light of 1.7 no longer being supported it still might be a good >>>> idea to release a final 1.7 build so at least the stated VS 2015 is not >>>> broken forever for 1.7. >>>> >>>> If it's going to be released, then I'd also propose to apply the >>>> correctness-patch (see: [PATCH] correct ToolsVersion in VS project files) >>>> which also corrects the ToolsVersion-parameter for VS >= 2013. >>> >>> I fine with canning 1.7.22 in favor of a "truly golden" 1.7.23. >>> After all, we rolled 1.7.22 for a similar reason not because >>> of actual user code breakage. >>> >>> That said, it may require extra testing effort on Windows >>> (at least testing that vs2015 and vs2013 work) and I'd >>> rather have our Windows devs comment on that. >>> >>> -- Stefan^2. >> I can test on vs2013. If necessary I can also upgrade my environment to vs >> 2015, but I'd prefer to keep 2013 for now (and I don't think I can use them >> both alongside each other). >> >> Just so you know: Using VS 2015 and VS 2013 alongside one another is >> supported and works quite well (have it running here too -- actually I've >> set up VS 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2015 all on the same machine). >> >> Regards, >> Stefan >> > Oh, ok, great. Thanks for letting me know. > > Then I might be able to test them both, if that's desired. That is, if > there is consensus on making a 1.7.23, and someone does the RM bits > for that ...
It's up to you guys who have Windows environments to speak up here. :) I can do the RM bits for 1.7.23 once we have the fixes and backports lined up. -- Brane
