Branko Čibej <[email protected]> writes:
>> I would be happy to roll both of the tarballs, if that's what everyone
>> feels like doing. But just to be sure — are there any other opinions about
>> also releasing 1.8.17?
>
> We should at least go through the 1.8.x STATUS and CHANGES to see what's
> in the queue.
We have already merged two fixes for user-reported crashes:
https://svn.apache.org/r1751204
Resolve stack corruption in swig-perl
Justification:
User requested fix. Breaks git's svn clone support in some
use-cases. See
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg97227.html
https://svn.apache.org/r1764565
Handle merging to local add as error instead of segfault.
Justification:
Segfault. User reported.
And there are four nominations with two +1 votes in 1.8.x/STATUS:
* r1706783
Really pass patch result to svn_client_patch() filter
* r1711346
Properly remove tempfiles in svnlook on diff errors such as EPIPE.
* r1717875, r1717878
Make inherited property api consistent over all ra layers
* r1728387
Fix issue 4611, gpg-agent and passwords with a percent character.
Regards,
Evgeny Kotkov
