On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Julian Foad <julianf...@apache.org> wrote: > Johan Corveleyn wrote: > [...] >> >> Although the more liberal editing is not an option, I still think we >> should go forward with migrating to Confluence. For the other reasons >> (more attractive to all kinds of contributors (also non-coders), lower >> barriers, faster editing/saving, ...). Plus: in the longer term, infra >> wants to end-of-life their moinmoin service, if I understood >> correctly. >> >> gmcdonald will be sending me the Universal Wiki Converter tools and >> actual moinmoin pages of Subversion, so I can experiment a bit with >> it. > > > Is there any more news, Johan?
Yeah, sorry I went dark on that. I tried asking for the necessary stuff on hipchat several times (even 2 days ago), was promised every time that I would receive them, but haven't gotten anything :-(. I'll keep trying. > I wonder if it would be helpful to get the new Confluence instance up and > running as a first step, and then we we could start using it for new stuff > right away. Yes, that might be a good idea. No need for the migration of the old stuff to block new stuff. > Over a period of time, as a low priority background task, you and others > could do manual or assisted migration of pages from MoinMoin, without > blocking the use of Confluence for new stuff, unless the migration tools > don't work well in that scenario. Any thoughts? I guess that should be fine. -- Johan
