On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:21:15PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I am just questioning the usefulness of halting the presses and restarting
> the soak for another month for something that isn't a security / data
> corruption issue. I anticipate that problems of similar severity to this
> one will still be discovered after we release 1.10.0, regardless of
> whether we release 1.10.0 at end of March or later.
> Though maybe my idea of the impact of this bug is wrong?
> If this really makes some repositories entirely unusable with authz enabled
> then of course it should be considered a blocker. Is it this severe?
I have misread our flowchart at:
It seems for this kind of issue we'd extend soak by just one week instead
of four? I wouldn't mind a one-week extension for this kind of bug fix.
One week seems reasonable.