Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> writes:

> Which leads me to believe that r1778923 may have been based on wrong
> assumptions about performance. The new authz is not fast enough to
> significantly reduce per-request overhead.

My testing so far was with a very small authz file -- only a handful of
rules and aliases.  If I add a few hundred trival rules to the file then
1.11 becomes signifcantly slower than 1.9 while reverting is still much
faster:

            1.9:  4.3s
     trunk 1.11: 14.6s
  reverted 1.11:  1.9s

-- 
Philip

Reply via email to