Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> writes: > Which leads me to believe that r1778923 may have been based on wrong > assumptions about performance. The new authz is not fast enough to > significantly reduce per-request overhead.
My testing so far was with a very small authz file -- only a handful of rules and aliases. If I add a few hundred trival rules to the file then 1.11 becomes signifcantly slower than 1.9 while reverting is still much faster: 1.9: 4.3s trunk 1.11: 14.6s reverted 1.11: 1.9s -- Philip