Julian Foad wrote on Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:20 +0100: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > The 'CHANGES' file in the 1.10.1 tarball is missing the last two > > > changes, that were merged last night: > > > > The CHANGES file in 1.10.1 also has a "Version 1.11.0" section with some > > bugfixes listed in it. > > > > I think CHANGES in 1.10.x (and earlier) releases shouldn't have a > > section for trunk since the contents of 1.11.0 may change between now > > and when 1.11.0-GA is tagged. > > Yes, it's a bit ugly. Sorry. > > Is it important enough that you need me (or someone else) to scrap that > attempt and re-roll? I can probably do so by next Monday, maybe earlier, > if needed.
I'm not concerned about the fact that 1.11.0's changes are included in the 1.10.1 tarball in some form. That's just a documentation bug which we can fix for 1.10.2. I am, however, concerned about downstreams obtaining the version number by parsing the first line of CHANGES and getting 1.11.0. That is: the form in which 1.11.0's changes are serialized into the 1.10.1 tarball is what concerns me. Makes sense? Cheers, Daniel
