> On Jan 3, 2019, at 4:18 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > > Mark Phippard wrote on Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:56 -0500: >> Looks good. If we cannot get rid of the iFrame > > We could replace the iframe by something else, but for the time being, ---
Are we still using server-side includes for the navigation and headers? Would that work for this as well? I'd think that maybe the HTML you have created could get embedded on the fly via a similar technique? I do have some vague recollection we may have been asked to stop using the SSI's at some point though. Mark
