Mark Phippard wrote on Thu, 03 Jan 2019 16:36 -0500: > > > On Jan 3, 2019, at 4:18 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > > wrote: > > > > Mark Phippard wrote on Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:56 -0500: > >> Looks good. If we cannot get rid of the iFrame > > > > We could replace the iframe by something else, but for the time > > being, --- > > Are we still using server-side includes for the navigation and > headers?
Yes. > Would that work for this as well? Yes. > I'd think that maybe the HTML you have created could get embedded on > the fly via a similar technique? Yes, just replace <iframe src="foo"/> line by the SSI include syntax. I have no opinion as to how the information should be presented (iframe / SSI / otherwise) > I do have some vague recollection we may have been asked to stop using > the SSI's at some point though.
