On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 4:56 PM Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Den ons 27 apr. 2022 kl 21:02 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name>: >> >> As to the general rule, I think we're missing a piece: the overlap >> period. We should say something along the lines of "Every LTS release >> will be supported for at least Y years, or until M months after the >> release of another LTS .0, whichever comes later.". > > > +1 to have an overlap period. > > Y = 4, M = 3? Or M = 6?
I'm also +1 to have an overlap period, and the idea of "at least Y years, or until M months after the release of another LTS .0, whichever comes later" seems quite reasonable to me. Cheers, Nathan
