On 2022-08-14 10:56:07 -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote: > Regarding LICENSE, I also think it should remain identical.
OK (if a change is needed, perhaps Apache could do it first, like what the FSF did for GPLv3, in 2017 IIRC). However, I think that there would be no problems to update the license location in source files. > Regarding URLs that became incorrect for other reasons, e.g., > https://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#cla, I think > those should be addressed in separate patches... [...] This is also what I think. > I'm attaching an updated patch with the following changes: > > (1) Revert LICENSE > (2) Revert the license headers > (3) In a few files [1], no URLs were changed but a newline was added > to the end of the file, which wasn't there before. I think this should > be done in a separate patch. > > Please check the updated patch... I'll look at it later. > [1] Those files are: > build/generator/templates/svn_config.vcxproj.ezt > build/generator/templates/svn_locale.vcxproj.ezt > build/generator/templates/vcnet_vcxproj_filters.ezt > subversion/libsvn_subr/win32_crashrpt_dll.h Are you sure? I cannot see any such change in my patch. Couldn't this be the result of the revert of the licence headers? -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
