On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 7:41 AM Timofei Zhakov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:20 PM Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10. 5. 26 14:44, Branko Čibej wrote: >> >> On 9. 5. 26 08:41, Branko Čibej wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> This is just to let you know that I'm working on updating JavaHL. Not >> adding everything that's missing, >> but updating the use of deprecated APIs and adding things like WC-version >> and store-pristines options. >> >> I'll try to get this ready for the next 1.15.0 release candidate. >> >> >> Done as much as I can be bothered to. Please review branches/javahl-1.15. >> I'd like to merge that to trunk soon and propose for backport to 1.15.x for >> the next release candidate. >> >> Tested on ARM64 with JDK 1.8, 11 and 25. >> >> >> Any takers? Otherwise I'll just merge to trunk and create the backport >> proposal. All the JavaHL tests still pass. >> >> >> On this note: do we have any reliable information about there being any >> actual users of JavaHL outside of our test suite? Maintaining this monster >> is not the most fun thing I can think of, so unless we have actual >> downstream users, I'd prefer to mark the whole thing as deprecated and move >> on. >> > > I assume JetBrains' IDEs might use those bindings for their SVN > integration but again there is no information that I have if I wasn't > guessing. > > -- > Timofei Zhakov > Ah, that reminds me of the Eclipse ecosystem. Subclipse (SVN client for Eclipse) looks like it has thousands of installs per month [1]. [1] https://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/subclipse#metrics Cheers, Nathan
