On Thu, 14 May 2026, 13:16 Nathan Hartman, <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 3:44 AM Joe Orton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:19:36PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> > On this note: do we have any reliable information about there being any
>> > actual users of JavaHL outside of our test suite? Maintaining this
>> monster
>> > is not the most fun thing I can think of, so unless we have actual
>> > downstream users, I'd prefer to mark the whole thing as deprecated and
>> move
>> > on.
>>
>> Two data points from a downstream packager, FWIW -
>>
>> 1. We build the JavaHL bindings in the Fedora packages, but there are no
>> other packages in Fedora which depend on them.
>>
>> 2. We stopped shipping the JavaHL bindings in RHEL9 and did not get any
>> requests to add them back.
>>
>> Regards, Joe
>>
>
> There is at least one cross-platform Subversion GUI that relies on the
> JavaHL bindings (SmartSVN).
>
> Nathan
>


Yes, I wondered about SmartSVN. I was involved in porting it from JavaSvn
(? a pure Java library) to JavaHL. I just don't know if they stayed with
JavaHL afterwards. It's been a long time since we heard from the gentlemen
from Syntevo.

-- Brane

Reply via email to