Den ons 22 juli 2026 kl 16:54 skrev Branko Čibej <[email protected]>:
> On 22. 7. 2026 16:25, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 3:18 PM Ivan Zhakov <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, 16 May 2026 at 20:19, Nathan Hartman <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > r1934265 (improving the CMake text in INSTALL) reminded me that CMake > is not yet mentioned in the 1.15.x Release Notes. > > I'd like to add it there--after all, it is a new major (and long- > requested!) feature in 1.15.x! > > +1! > > > But I've lost track of where it is > currently. Has it reached parity with the autotools build, e.g., being > able to build all the bindings? Any current limitations I should > document? > > > A week ago I created document to summarize features supported by different > Subversion build systems. > > Google Sheet > document:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1goa9mrX75RhqQLSsNAr9z6G6cqDvUMDe5xWDJYG99cg/edit?gid=0#gid=0 > > Is this spreadsheet considered the source of truth for the status of > the CMake build? If so, can/should I link to it from the Release > Notes? Alternatively, we could move this to the CWIKI, or turn it into > a HTML table and put it in the release notes directly, or... any other > ideas?? > > > Using cwiki and linking from there would be fine, it's a live document > after all. Maybe add columns for "supported in version..." since at least > the CMake build will be catching up for a while. > I don't like the CWiki layout and I've been bitten more than once that URLs changed under the feet of a webpage (probably because someone improved the title). I would prefer to make a separate page buildsystems.html or something like that and convert this into a HTML table. > > > PDF is also attached. > > I didn't all features: in many cases I just have checked relevant source code. > > Any comments and fixes will be much appreciated. > > > > On the testing side, our test suit also supports https:// and svn+ssh:// > and various combinations of server version and WC version, those lines > should probably be added. Though there's no automated support for the less > frequently used features. > It also supports testing the different bindings. Maybe doublecheck `grep check Makefile`? Cheers, Daniel
