On 22. 7. 2026 17:04, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
Den ons 22 juli 2026 kl 16:54 skrev Branko Čibej <[email protected]>:On 22. 7. 2026 16:25, Nathan Hartman wrote:On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 3:18 PM Ivan Zhakov<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:On Sat, 16 May 2026 at 20:19, Nathan Hartman<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:r1934265 (improving the CMake text in INSTALL) reminded me that CMake is not yet mentioned in the 1.15.x Release Notes. I'd like to add it there--after all, it is a new major (and long- requested!) feature in 1.15.x!+1!But I've lost track of where it is currently. Has it reached parity with the autotools build, e.g., being able to build all the bindings? Any current limitations I should document?A week ago I created document to summarize features supported by different Subversion build systems. Google Sheet document: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1goa9mrX75RhqQLSsNAr9z6G6cqDvUMDe5xWDJYG99cg/edit?gid=0#gid=0Is this spreadsheet considered the source of truth for the status of the CMake build? If so, can/should I link to it from the Release Notes? Alternatively, we could move this to the CWIKI, or turn it into a HTML table and put it in the release notes directly, or... any other ideas??Using cwiki and linking from there would be fine, it's a live document after all. Maybe add columns for "supported in version..." since at least the CMake build will be catching up for a while.I don't like the CWiki layout and I've been bitten more than once that URLs changed under the feet of a webpage (probably because someone improved the title). I would prefer to make a separate page buildsystems.html or something like that and convert this into a HTML table.
True that Confluence isn't friendly in that regard. "Permalinks" exist but are less permanent than the dictionary definition.
-- Brane
