Hi Rendov, On 5 August 2017 at 04:28, Rendov Norra <[email protected]> wrote: > I've compiled 9base against musl, and dd spits errors about memory at > me if I try to invoke it. I looked at the source and determined sbrk > wasn't doing what it was supposed to. I don't know if this is to do > with my version of musl, or just musl in general, but I replaced sbrk > with malloc and it seems to work fine after recompilation. > > Is there any reason sbrk shouldn't be changed?
No, I have removed the remaining sbrk() uses. Thanks, Anselm
