SGTM. Starting a thread now. Max
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 8:25 AM Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > In fact, IMO we should create a specific email thread here on dev@ about > this. > > > On Sep 2, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > As mentioned, we should mention this in our report. Also, we should > > generate specific targeted questions and/or asks of the mentors. > > > >> On Sep 1, 2018, at 2:15 PM, Maxime Beauchemin < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Justin, > >> > >> We have yet to come up with our first Apache release. We're having > issues > >> wrapping our heads around how to come up with our LICENSE file given the > >> number of dependencies we have on the Javascript side. Since we package > the > >> JS bundle along with our Python application, it seems like we'll have to > >> come up with either a programmatic way to extract the LICENSE info, or > ship > >> the application without the JS deps, and provide instruction has to how > to > >> fetch and build the package deps, which isn't very convenient. We also > have > >> some minor deps on GPL lib, one of which we need to get clarity as to > how > >> to to handle them. It's related to the "chardet" sub dependency of the > Pypi > >> requests library. > >> > >> Clearly we need to come up with a plan for our first Apache release. > I'll > >> bring this up at the next committer meeting (this upcoming Friday) > >> > >> Max > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:56 PM Justin Mclean <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I was taking at look at incubating projects and noticed that you you > don't > >>> seem to be following the required release process. I don't see for > instance > >>> any VOTE threads [3] or checking of the release by the Incubator PMC > [4] > >>> and it looks like you are publishing releases elsewhere [4][1] and > there > >>> are no releases in the release ares. [5][6] > >>> > >>> I'm not familiar with your project so hopefully I'm mistaken (and > >>> apologies in advance if I am), but I think it would be good if you > could > >>> address this in your podling report which is due shortly. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Justin > >>> > >>> 1.https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/releases > >>> 3. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval > >>> 4.http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#publication > >>> 5.http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-distribution > >>> 6.https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/superset > >>> > > > >
