Hi All, I came up with another version of the patch [1] I developed as a proposed solution to the subject issue.
In the meantime I came across other issues that can be thought as requests of almost the same thing: [2], [3] and [4]. In the patch I upgraded the "E#" token in TOC as numbered item, using the already provided function lcl_GetNumString() to obtain the string, by changing the overload method (class SwTxtNode): GetNumString( const bool _bInclPrefixAndSuffixStrings = true ) const; into: GetNumString( const bool _bInclPrefixAndSuffixStrings = true, const unsigned int _nRestrictToThisLevel = MAXLEVEL - 1 ) const; in order to accommodate the new functionality. Comment on that are greatly appreciated. I'd like to know if the issues I found can be added to a single task of enhancing the indexes generation (not only the TOC). If so, I will try to write a specification for all the four of them (well, as soon as I figure out how to write the spec, I've already seen some documents explaining how to write an OOo consistent one...). -- Kind Regards, Giuseppe Castagno Acca Esse http://www.acca-esse.eu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53420#desc12 [2] http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=14725 [3] http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=23562 [4] http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52578 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
