Hi Giuseppe,
Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
Hi All, I came up with another version of the patch [1] I developed as a proposed solution to the subject issue. In the meantime I came across other issues that can be thought as requests of almost the same thing: [2], [3] and [4]. In the patch I upgraded the "E#" token in TOC as numbered item, using the already provided function lcl_GetNumString() to obtain the string, by changing the overload method (class SwTxtNode): GetNumString( const bool _bInclPrefixAndSuffixStrings = true ) const; into: GetNumString( const bool _bInclPrefixAndSuffixStrings = true, const unsigned int _nRestrictToThisLevel = MAXLEVEL - 1 ) const; in order to accommodate the new functionality. Comment on that are greatly appreciated.
I'm looking forward to look at your patch next week.
I'd like to know if the issues I found can be added to a single task of enhancing the indexes generation (not only the TOC).
I think, you are right. Issues 23562 and 52578 can be directly marked as duplicates. For issue 14725, I asked the submitter.
If so, I will try to write a specification for all the four of them (well, as soon as I figure out how to write the spec, I've already seen some documents explaining how to write an OOo consistent one...).
Do you already visit website specs.openoffice.org? Regards, Oliver. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
