[email protected] wrote on 07/22/2009 02:10:07 PM: > [email protected] > > Hi Steve, > > On 07/21/09 05:15 PM, Bing BJ Yin wrote: > > Hi Mikhail, > > > > We will update the specification ASAP. > > Please do not do it before the new design has been reviewed and approved > by QA and UX, as I have mentioned in my previous email. > > > No issue for commitment. If need be > > I can create one. Thanks. > > Yes, we need an issue for this, when you open one please set me ( mav ) > in CC-field. I remember checking in code to CWS does not need #issue. You mean this #issue is for integration to MWS?
> Additionally it is a good practice to add issue number to the commit > comments, like > "#i<issue number># <text comment>" > > That allows in future to find the related to the change issue easily. > > Best regards, > Mikhail. > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Steve Yin > > ------------------------------------- > > Symphony Common App and Performance > > IBM Corporation | Lotus Software > > Tel: 86-10-82454405 > > Email: [email protected] > > Notes: Bing BJ Yin/China/IBM > > Address: 2F, Ring Bldg. No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software Park, No. > > 8 Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, > > P.R.China > > > > > > > > From: > > Mikhail Voytenko <[email protected]> > > To: > > [email protected] > > Date: > > 2009-07-21 21:32 > > Subject: > > Re: [sw-discussion] Removed IBM(C) from IBM modified files in CWS > > wordencryption > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Sorry for the small delay with the integration. > > The cws was rebased on DEV300_m51, it took a little bit more time than > > expected because of local problems with the rebase process. Additionally > > I had a one week vacation, that has also delayed handling of the cws. > > > > The only remaining task currently is to update the specification ( the > > implementation should be reviewed by QA- or UX-engineer before ). After > > that the cws will be ready for QA. I think the cws will get ready for QA > > status this week. > > > > By the way, which issue was used to commit the changes to the cws? > > > > Best regards, > > Mikhail. > > > > > > On 07/11/09 05:13 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote: > >> Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> > >>> Hi *, > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Ming Fei Jia<[email protected]> > > wrote: > >>>> Mathias, > >>>> > >>>> Any status update for the integration? We are free to privide any > > support > >>>> if needed. Thanks.? > >>> The wordencryption cws is > >>> * not set to public > >> That indeed should be changed. > >> > >>> * is still in state "new" > >> This is fine as we are still in the review state. > >> > >>> * doesn't have any dates nor target-release set > >> This is fine also as it doesn't make sense to set any dates until you > >> know if there is still something to be done. > >> > >> So I think that this wasn't the kind of status update that Ming Fei Ja > >> expected. :-) > >> > >> Ciao, > >> Mathias > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
