[email protected] wrote on 07/24/2009 10:58:30 PM:
> From:
> Sent by:
>
> [email protected]
>
> Hi Ming Fei Ja, Steve,
>
> On 07/22/09 07:55 PM, Ming Fei Jia wrote:
> > I remember checking in code to CWS does not need #issue. You mean this
> > #issue is for integration to MWS?
>
> Yes the issue is necessary to send the CWS to QA. It is no problem if no
> issue was used for check in, there is just a good practice to use the
> issue number in the comments. It allows to provide much more information
> related to the change.
OK, this will be a piece of experiences for IBM developers during the
future contributions.
>
> I have just opened the issue
> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103780
Thanks much.
>
> The CWS is now in QA. I have updated the specification regarding the
> password dialog related to MS document export, since I had to do a
> change in this part of the specification anyway.
>
> If you would like to provide more details in the specification regarding
> encryption mechanics, I would recommend to create a new specification,
> like the following one
> http://specs.openoffice.org/appwide/interoperability/
> Import_Password_Protected_MS_Office_Files.sxw
Steve will give a specification document like your given example. Hope it
can be helpful.
>
> Before the CWS can be integrated into the master a feature-change
> notification should be sent at least to the [email protected]
> list. Would you prefer to do it yourself or should I send it
It does not matter. We'll appreciate if you can help do it. Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Mikhail.
>
