On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Andreas Veithen <[email protected]
> wrote:

> -1
>
> I think that this approach is incompatible with the ASL because we
> would distribute binaries (that are not 3rd party binaries with an
> appropriate license) without distributing the corresponding source
> code. I think that the patch should be produced from sources during
> the Synapse build.
>

I think you're right. We should put the patched source files under
modules/patches. Not the binary.


>
> Andreas
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:01, Kasun Indrasiri <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > I've completed the upgrading of commons vfs to version 2.0. Also add the
> > required fixes with synapse patching mechanism. [1]
> >
> > [1]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/synapse/trunk/java/modules/patches/jars/commons-vfs2-2.0-vfs-178.jar
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > Kasun Indrasiri
> > Senior Software Engineer,
> > WSO2 Inc. - "Lean . Enterprise . Middleware" - http://www.wso2.com/
> > Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Hiranya Jayathilaka
Associate Technical Lead;
WSO2 Inc.;  http://wso2.org
E-mail: [email protected];  Mobile: +94 77 633 3491
Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com

Reply via email to