Hi Fabio, This seems a very good idea. You could also consider a complete new mapping tab page on which we could do the sync mapping. In that case the current mapping is used for propagation.
Regards, Ernst 2012/12/14 Denis Signoretto <denis.signore...@intesys.it> > > Another way to get the same result couldn't be > creating a specialization between sync and provisioned resources? > > Regards, > Denis > > > -----Messaggio originale----- > > Da: Fabio Martelli [mailto:fabio.marte...@gmail.com] > > Inviato: venerdì 14 dicembre 2012 16:55 > > A: dev@syncope.apache.org > > Oggetto: Schema Mapping improvement > > > > > > Hi guys, > > since I see a strong limitation about the schema mapping > > configuration I'd like to discuss with you about an improvement. > > > > From my PPOV Syncope should give the possibility to specify > > two different mappings for synchronization and propagation. > > > > My suggestion is to provide two boolean flags: the former to > > specify a propagation mapping and the latter to specify a > > synchronization mapping. > > Of course, each mapping must have a flag to true at least. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Regards, > > F. > > >
