Il giorno 14/dic/2012, alle ore 17.07, Denis Signoretto ha scritto: > > Another way to get the same result couldn't be > creating a specialization between sync and provisioned resources?
Hi Denis, I am not sure to have well understood. Do you mean the possibility to have different resource entities for the same target resource, one to be used for the provisioning and one for the synchronization? You know, currently this kind of configuration is already possible. Please, let me understand better. Regards, F. > > Regards, > Denis > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: Fabio Martelli [mailto:fabio.marte...@gmail.com] >> Inviato: venerdì 14 dicembre 2012 16:55 >> A: dev@syncope.apache.org >> Oggetto: Schema Mapping improvement >> >> >> Hi guys, >> since I see a strong limitation about the schema mapping >> configuration I'd like to discuss with you about an improvement. >> >> From my PPOV Syncope should give the possibility to specify >> two different mappings for synchronization and propagation. >> >> My suggestion is to provide two boolean flags: the former to >> specify a propagation mapping and the latter to specify a >> synchronization mapping. >> Of course, each mapping must have a flag to true at least. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Regards, >> F. >>
