> > But if I understand the description in SYNCOPE-275 correctly, it would cause > problems to switch to Spring 3.2 without removing all Spring MVC's > components. And of cause without Spring MVC's the old REST Interface could > not be used. Correct? > > You are right: we should then open another issue "Remove Spring MVC" for > 1.2.0 and make SYNCOPE-275 requiring this. Right? >
+1 This way we can continue using old REST API for 1.1.0 release and then remove Spring MVC in 1.2.0 release. I personally would also have no problem in removing Spring MVC for 1.1.0 release. But we don't have any pressure on this decision. We can get CXF services working (for most parts) and then we still have the chance to decide whether to switch now or later. Best regards. Jan
