On 21/01/2013 15:04, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
Hum, I actually thought you would have included the full CXF features in
1.1.0 alongside with still running but deprecated Spring MVC interfaces.
If I was wrong, could this be done?
It will be optimal for us, as far as we resolver list setters issue for TOs 
mentioned by Jan.

What about integration tests? I see two options:
A) activate both Spring MVC and CXF Rest tests already in 1.1.0 (will take a 
longer time)
B) keep only Spring MVC tests running for 1.1.0 and activate CXF tests only in 
1.2.0, when Spring MVC will be removed with in SYNCOPE-275

If users will start with CXF rest already in 1.1.0, option (A) makes more 
sense. From other side than integration tests will take definitely more time.

See my latest reply to Jan: in this context (i.e. provide a transitional version for projects upgrading from 1_0_X), (B) makes more sense.

Regards.

-----Original Message-----
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: Montag, 21. Januar 2013 14:02
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving issues from one version to another

On 21/01/2013 13:51, Jan Bernhardt wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: Montag, 21. Januar 2013 13:18
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving issues from one version to another

On 21/01/2013 12:47, Fabio Martelli wrote:
[...]
I think that SYNCOPE-122 and SYNCOPE-135 will not make the difference
in reference to the load.
I disagree on this point: anyway, keeping SYNCOPE-122 in 1.1.0 (point
4 of my initial checklist) and moving SYNCOPE-135 and SYNCOPE-136
from
1.2.0 to 1.1.0 is really +-0 for me.

Here is the new list, then, with changes required by Fabio and Marco:

1. move SYNCOPE-231 (e.g. CXF migration) and all subtasks to 1.1.0 2.
move
SYNCOPE-275 ("Upgrade Spring to 3.2") to 1.1.0 as it requires
SYNCOPE-231
Does this means that we will completely switch to CXF? I would be
completely happy about this! But until now I thought, that we would not
finish SYNCOPE-231 completely with 1.1.0 release, but only prepare
everything as close as possible and then do this final step for next release.
However I would not be concerned to completely switch within this release,
since most work will be done anyway.

Hum, I actually thought you would have included the full CXF features in
1.1.0 alongside with still running but deprecated Spring MVC interfaces.
If I was wrong, could this be done?

3. move SYNCOPE-204 ("Add Karaf features") to 1.2.0 4. move
SYNCOPE-135 (" Password reset") to 1.1.0 5. move SYNCOPE-136
("Password required for resource subscription") to 1.1.0
+/-0 from me for these tasks. I don't feel a need to include them in 1.1.0
release, but if someone if all excited about these features and has time to
get them done... Sure why not including them...

Same here.

--
Francesco Chicchiriccò

ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

Reply via email to