I guess we'll see the input from INFRA appear in the comments of the pull request, or else in e.g. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10931 and associated issues.
Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org > wrote: > Quick update: > > 1. Pierre has submitted the first PR for puppet at > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/pull/156 > > 2. I have just updated the PoC code to Syncope 2.0.1 (that's the second > commit, exactly 1 year after fist one: time flies): > https://github.com/apache/iampoc/commit/a155f59362e6f553356e > 7e52116834837dbda984 > > However, without someone from Infra providing info + specifications, there > is no much more we can do. > Infra, please if you're there, knock once. > > Regards. > > > On 16/12/2016 11:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > >> HI all, >> I am happy to report that the VM for the PoC was made available ( >> syncope-vm2.apache.org) - see INFRA-10931. >> I have been able to successfully access via SSH (sudo does not seem to >> work, but nothing problematic about this ATM). >> >> I know from IRC that Pierre is at work to try to define a first Puppet >> setup including JDK 1.8, Maven, Tomcat 8.5 and PostgreSQL. >> Besides such components, the setup process will also need to fetch and >> build the Maven project from the dedicated GIT repository (see below). >> >> Now in fist place I think we should re-attempt to start discussing the >> actual requirements of this PoC, and then the planning. >> >> This means, essentially, to gather some information from the infra team. >> >> I propose again to concentrate, from the list shown by Tony in [1], on >> the first item, e.g. "https://id.apache.org (The end-user part of it)", >> which triggers these first questions: >> >> 1. does the current app exclusively manage data from LDAP? >> 2. if so, could you provide some details: >> a. which LDAP server implementation? OpenLDAP? >> b. which object classes are in use? baseDN(s)? >> c. which processes / tools are reading from LDAP? which are writing? >> >> In INFRA-10931, Greg proposed to provide an LDIF export of the production >> LDAP servers so that we can setup a local detached copy which we could use >> for tests. >> >> Looking forward to your reply. >> Regards. >> >> On 21/12/2015 17:16, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> we now have our GIT repository at >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/iampoc.git >>> >>> which is also mirrored, as usual, to GitHub. >>> >>> As you can see, I have made an initial commit featuring an empty default >>> Syncope 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT setup. >>> >>> Now, waiting for the VM to be available (see INFRA-10931), we can start >>> defining what is actually going to be part of this PoC, and how we are >>> going to implement the related features. >>> >>> From the list showed by Tony in [1], I'd start with first item, e.g. " >>> https://id.apache.org (The end-user part of it)". >>> >>> Here are some questions: >>> >>> 1. does the current app exclusively manage data from LDAP? >>> 2. if so, could you provide some details: >>> a. LDAP architecture (replicas, load-balancing, ..) >>> b. which LDAP server implementation? OpenLDAP? >>> c. which object classes are in use? baseDN(s)? >>> d. which processes / tools are reading from LDAP? which are writing? >>> e. is there any test LDAP instance available? if not, is it possible >>> to pre-load some data from the production instances in order to build a >>> test instance in our development VM? >>> >>> Please add questions if you see something missing. >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/utlcjkanilz4qztz >>> >> > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation > Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >
