Hi Janardhan
I don't think LFS is needed, since it is mainly toy size datasets like MNIST and Adult currently. Therefore no need to bring cannons for pigeons :) Best regards Sebastian ________________________________ From: Janardhan <janardhan.pulivar...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 8:47:29 PM To: dev@systemds.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] General website development flow Hi Sebastian, I am working on adding datasets to our apache/systemds-website repo. I am exploring the git LFS option. Hopefully this method would be helpful. I will post the updates here. Thanks, Janardhan On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 10:52 PM Baunsgaard, Sebastian <baunsga...@tugraz.at.invalid> wrote: > Thanks for clarifying, > > I was worried earlier today that it was more complicated, > > but i agree that the current change is for the better. > > > new features: > > > 1+2) I would not like the automatic build since we have artifacts for old > releases on the webpage, therefore keeping the manual control is better in > my opinion for the rare occasions we want to update the main webpage. > > > best regards > > Sebastian > > ________________________________ > From: Janardhan <janard...@apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 7:13:48 PM > To: dev@systemds.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] General website development flow > > Hi, > > The website generated files are now modified via `asf-staging` branch > instead of svn repo. Source files are updated normally in the `master` > branch. > > At present the main website is being deployed from this branch based on > [1]. And how is this done internally via infrastructure puppet[2]. > > ```yml > publish: > profile: ~ > whoami: asf-staging > ``` > > The update instructions are in the readme[3]. > > Next features: > > 1. Automatic update of the website files with github actions. > 2. Use the `asf-site` branch for the official website. > Creating a new branch `asf-site` with strict review requirement (at least 1 > human check) > for merging `asf-staging` commits into `asf-site` via PR. > > What happened to our svn repo? > > The SVN repo[4] is intact - but our changes won't be reflected since > we are using gitpubsub instead of svnpubsub. > > Now, the configuration file is properly configured and branches are > protected. > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/systemds-website/blob/f19f676b2543bc1aaecb9f8cdf03f957edc1d1f4/.asf.yaml#L36-L39 > > [2] > > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/8dc9f16c3ec530cf0c1babd835696daf764ab235/modules/gitbox/files/asfgit/asfyaml.py#L635-L663 > [3] > https://github.com/apache/systemds-website/tree/master#updating-the-website > [4] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/systemds/ > > Thanks, > Janardhan >
