I just found out that git lfs is not at all an option anyway.
What is the size of the datasets, if I can ask?

--
> We have artifacts for old releases on the webpage.

We do not keep any artifacts in the repo right? - they are hosted
by downloads.apache.org

Yes, I think the present setup is pretty much ok (simple update,
and github action to check that the website will build).

Best,
Janardhan

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:21 AM Baunsgaard, Sebastian
<baunsga...@tugraz.at.invalid> wrote:

> Hi Janardhan
>
>
> I don't think LFS is needed, since it is mainly toy size datasets like
> MNIST and Adult currently. Therefore no need to bring cannons for pigeons :)
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Sebastian
>
> ________________________________
> From: Janardhan <janardhan.pulivar...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 8:47:29 PM
> To: dev@systemds.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] General website development flow
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> I am working on adding datasets to our apache/systemds-website repo.
> I am exploring the git LFS option. Hopefully this method would be helpful.
>
> I will post the updates here.
>
> Thanks,
> Janardhan
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 10:52 PM Baunsgaard, Sebastian
> <baunsga...@tugraz.at.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for clarifying,
> >
> > I was worried earlier today that it was more complicated,
> >
> > but i agree that the current change is for the better.
> >
> >
> > new features:
> >
> >
> > 1+2) I would not like the automatic build since we have artifacts for old
> > releases on the webpage, therefore keeping the manual control is better
> in
> > my opinion for the rare occasions we want to update the main webpage.
> >
> >
> > best regards
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Janardhan <janard...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 7:13:48 PM
> > To: dev@systemds.apache.org
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] General website development flow
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The website generated files are now modified via `asf-staging` branch
> > instead of svn repo. Source files are updated normally in the `master`
> > branch.
> >
> > At present the main website is being deployed from this branch based on
> > [1]. And how is this done internally via infrastructure puppet[2].
> >
> > ```yml
> > publish:
> >   profile: ~
> >   whoami:  asf-staging
> > ```
> >
> > The update instructions are in the readme[3].
> >
> > Next features:
> >
> > 1. Automatic update of the website files with github actions.
> > 2. Use the `asf-site` branch for the official website.
> > Creating a new branch `asf-site` with strict review requirement (at
> least 1
> > human check)
> > for merging `asf-staging` commits into `asf-site` via PR.
> >
> > What happened to our svn repo?
> >
> > The SVN repo[4] is intact - but our changes won't be reflected since
> > we are using gitpubsub instead of svnpubsub.
> >
> > Now, the configuration file is properly configured and branches are
> > protected.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/systemds-website/blob/f19f676b2543bc1aaecb9f8cdf03f957edc1d1f4/.asf.yaml#L36-L39
> >
> > [2]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/8dc9f16c3ec530cf0c1babd835696daf764ab235/modules/gitbox/files/asfgit/asfyaml.py#L635-L663
> > [3]
> >
> https://github.com/apache/systemds-website/tree/master#updating-the-website
> > [4] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/systemds/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Janardhan
> >
>

Reply via email to