Hi! TLDR: +1
I have tested the bin.tgz release artifact. A few non fatal glitches in the run script may be fixed by including [1], if there is another RC. I checked the signature and checksums. They're all valid of course ;-) A suggestion to improve/streamline the checksums: If you add the file name of the file to check in the file containing the checksum (separated by a space) you can use the check functionality of (for example) sha1sum like so: $ sha1sum -c systemds-2.2.1-bin.tgz.sha1 systemds-2.2.1-bin.tgz: OK That works if the content of systemds-2.2.1-bin.tgz.sha1 looks like this: $ cat systemds-2.2.1-bin.tgz.sha1 78104fed26d80c108c61fff491a3265bd1b710cc systemds-2.2.1-bin.tgz At the moment, the checksum files only contain the checksum, not the file name. A minor change in the release scripts could make the <checksum><space><filename> format of the md5/sha* files happen. Since these suggestions are not critical I'd say +1 Regards, Mark [1] https://github.com/apache/systemds/pull/1456 On 10.11.21 16:24, arnab phani wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemDS version > 2.2.1 > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemDS 2.2.1 > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > To learn more about Apache SystemDS, please see > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsystemds.apache.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cmdokter%40know-center.at%7C86ba7734bff0430d812408d9a45e4a2a%7C0d3c92e977ae4f49bd126ff29e8f1c37%7C0%7C0%7C637721547745500935%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=hNxyq8JABeF1%2Fp94f3ZIOy9AWkzi%2B9ggtnC7MWrYqkc%3D&reserved=0 > > > The tag to be voted on is > 2.2.1-rc1 (3a1681555f79b03c318eadee147be6923a4164eb): > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fsystemds%2Ftree%2F2.2.1-rc1&data=04%7C01%7Cmdokter%40know-center.at%7C86ba7734bff0430d812408d9a45e4a2a%7C0d3c92e977ae4f49bd126ff29e8f1c37%7C0%7C0%7C637721547745500935%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=uSKwV1Fw19Zs5NEX4x6lPpi%2FUfk4b5lnJAH2rjYYbks%3D&reserved=0 > > The release artifacts can be found at: > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fsystemds%2F2.2.1-rc1%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cmdokter%40know-center.at%7C86ba7734bff0430d812408d9a45e4a2a%7C0d3c92e977ae4f49bd126ff29e8f1c37%7C0%7C0%7C637721547745500935%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2Fv%2BS6kzCg5TAtmu5g3YTYt1%2BcNMXxOL%2FYuB7BzEa1mI%3D&reserved=0 > > The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachesystemds-1069%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fsystemds%2Fsystemds%2F2.2.1%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cmdokter%40know-center.at%7C86ba7734bff0430d812408d9a45e4a2a%7C0d3c92e977ae4f49bd126ff29e8f1c37%7C0%7C0%7C637721547745500935%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=NVdHKuLSFqowpJfRnDePflTccfjvgEEUVWgEtXDq%2FA8%3D&reserved=0 > > > > =========================== > == Apache Release policy == > =========================== > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Flegal%2Frelease-policy.html&data=04%7C01%7Cmdokter%40know-center.at%7C86ba7734bff0430d812408d9a45e4a2a%7C0d3c92e977ae4f49bd126ff29e8f1c37%7C0%7C0%7C637721547745500935%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=JxePZwRYdp8bYw7IpLPjS91PfYWh3Lmn1wO%2Fo1K%2FDno%3D&reserved=0 > > > ======================================= > == How can I help test this release? == > ======================================= > If you are a SystemDS user, you can help us test this release by taking an > existing Algorithm or workload and running on this release candidate, then > reporting any regressions. > > ================================================ > == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == > ================================================ > -1 votes should only occur for significant stop-ship bugs or legal related > issues (e.g. wrong license, missing header files, etc). Minor bugs or > regressions should not block this release. > > Regards, > Arnab.. >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
